Structured teardown using Pre-Mortem, Fermi Estimation, and Inversion. You get a PDF. Not encouragement.
Paste your idea, business model, and target customer. 5,000 characters. Forces clarity.
Your answers anchor the analysis to your specific assumptions — not a generic startup template.
A structured PDF with your Skepticism Score, fatal flaws, the hidden risk nobody mentions, and three concrete countermeasures. €2.99. Delivered in ~60 seconds.
"Here's what a real teardown looks like. Anonymized with permission."
"A solution for a problem that already has seventeen solutions, none of which anyone uses either."
Your second-order answer — "they'd have to rebuild the whole thing" — assumes the moat is complexity. It isn't. The moat you described is a 3-month sprint for any team with $500k. You've identified a distribution problem and mistaken it for a technical one.
Strong idea, fragile execution plan. The market exists. The go-to-market doesn't.
Forces explicit articulation of the scenarios most likely to kill the idea — before optimism has a chance to suppress them.
Bottom-up market sizing from first principles. Exposes the gap between reported TAM and the market that actually exists for this product.
Structural risks — regulatory, timing, distribution — that survive a successful product launch.
If you succeed, what do competitors copy? What does your moat look like in 18 months?
Preparation
The pre-mortem framework investors use — applied to your pitch.
Understanding the difference between the 'polite reason' and the truth.
What's going through their head while you're presenting.
Objections
Either your pitch survives the teardown — or you needed to know before your investors told you.